Arbeitspapier

Fly or cry: is airport noise costly?

Airport noise is costly. Airport location is typically associated with lower property prices. Airport expansion often sparks protests by local residents. In this paper, I provide new evidence on the costs of airport-related noise (and other disamenities of airports) for individuals. In contrast to previous work, I analyze voting results on restricting airport operations. Using data from a referendum on the closure of one of Berlin's inner-city airports, Tempelhof, I find that voting behavior is not primarily explained by exposure to airport disamenities. Rather, strong opposition to closure in the vicinity of Tempelhof indicates that adaptive preferences may be important.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: CESifo Working Paper ; No. 2732

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
Externalities
Public Goods
Health: Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise
Thema
noise
preferences
traffic
airports
Flughafen
Verkehrslärm
Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse
Offenbarte Präferenzen
Referendum
Wahlverhalten
Berlin

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
Nitsch, Volker
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo)
(wo)
Munich
(wann)
2009

Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
20.09.2024, 08:21 MESZ

Datenpartner

Dieses Objekt wird bereitgestellt von:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • Nitsch, Volker
  • Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo)

Entstanden

  • 2009

Ähnliche Objekte (12)