Arbeitspapier
Fly or cry: is airport noise costly?
Airport noise is costly. Airport location is typically associated with lower property prices. Airport expansion often sparks protests by local residents. In this paper, I provide new evidence on the costs of airport-related noise (and other disamenities of airports) for individuals. In contrast to previous work, I analyze voting results on restricting airport operations. Using data from a referendum on the closure of one of Berlin's inner-city airports, Tempelhof, I find that voting behavior is not primarily explained by exposure to airport disamenities. Rather, strong opposition to closure in the vicinity of Tempelhof indicates that adaptive preferences may be important.
- Sprache
-
Englisch
- Erschienen in
-
Series: CESifo Working Paper ; No. 2732
- Klassifikation
-
Wirtschaft
Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
Externalities
Public Goods
Health: Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise
- Thema
-
noise
preferences
traffic
airports
Flughafen
Verkehrslärm
Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse
Offenbarte Präferenzen
Referendum
Wahlverhalten
Berlin
- Ereignis
-
Geistige Schöpfung
- (wer)
-
Nitsch, Volker
- Ereignis
-
Veröffentlichung
- (wer)
-
Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo)
- (wo)
-
Munich
- (wann)
-
2009
- Handle
- Letzte Aktualisierung
-
20.09.2024, 08:21 MESZ
Datenpartner
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. Bei Fragen zum Objekt wenden Sie sich bitte an den Datenpartner.
Objekttyp
- Arbeitspapier
Beteiligte
- Nitsch, Volker
- Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo)
Entstanden
- 2009