Artikel

The fragility of an independent judiciary: Lessons from Hungary and Poland–and the European Union

When the European Union was founded, it was assumed that all Member States admitted as consolidated democracies would maintain their constitutional commitments. In recent years, Hungary and Poland have challenged this premise as elected autocratic governments in those countries have captured independent institutions and threatened long-term democracy. The judiciaries of these countries have been hard hit. In this paper, we trace what has happened to the judiciaries in Hungary and Poland, showing how first the constitutional courts and then the ordinary judiciary have been brought under the control of political forces so that there is no longer a separation of law and politics. We also explore why the European Union has so far not been able to stop this process. In the end, the European judiciary, particularly the Court of Justice, is attempting a rescue of national judiciaries, but the results are so far unclear.

Language
Englisch

Bibliographic citation
Journal: Communist and Post-Communist Studies ; ISSN: 1873-6920 ; Volume: 51 ; Year: 2018 ; Issue: 3 ; Pages: 189-200 ; Amsterdam: Elsevier

Classification
Wirtschaft
Subject
comparative constitutional law
judicial independence
Hungary
Poland
European Union
democratic decline

Event
Geistige Schöpfung
(who)
Kovács, Kriszta
Scheppele, Kim Lane
Event
Veröffentlichung
(who)
Elsevier
ZBW – Leibniz Information Centre for Economics
(where)
Amsterdam
(when)
2018

DOI
doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2018.07.005
Handle
Last update
10.03.2025, 11:42 AM CET

Data provider

This object is provided by:
ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft. If you have any questions about the object, please contact the data provider.

Object type

  • Artikel

Associated

  • Kovács, Kriszta
  • Scheppele, Kim Lane
  • Elsevier
  • ZBW – Leibniz Information Centre for Economics

Time of origin

  • 2018

Other Objects (12)