Arbeitspapier

What do we really know? Metrics for food insecurity and undernutrition

In this article, we critically review the three most common approaches of assessing chronic food insecurity and undernutrition: (i) the FAO indicator of undernourishment, (ii) household food consumption surveys, and (iii) childhood anthropometrics. There is a striking and worrying degree of inconsistency when one compares available estimates, which is due to methodological and empirical problems associated with all three approaches. Hence, the true extent of food insecurity and undernutrition is unknown. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of each approach and make concrete suggestions for improvement, which also requires additional research. A key component will be the planning and implementation of more comprehensive, standardized, and timely household surveys that cover food consumption and anthropometry, in addition to other socioeconomic and health variables. Such combined survey data will allow much better assessment of the problems' magnitude, as well as of trends, driving forces, and appropriate policy responses.

Sprache
Englisch

Erschienen in
Series: Discussion Papers ; No. 88

Klassifikation
Wirtschaft
Thema
Food security measurement
hunger
undernutrition
FAO indicator of undernourishment
household surveys
anthropometrics

Ereignis
Geistige Schöpfung
(wer)
de Haen, Hartwig
Klasen, Stephan
Qaim, Matin
Ereignis
Veröffentlichung
(wer)
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Courant Research Centre - Poverty, Equity and Growth (CRC-PEG)
(wo)
Göttingen
(wann)
2011

Handle
Letzte Aktualisierung
20.09.2024, 08:23 MESZ

Objekttyp

  • Arbeitspapier

Beteiligte

  • de Haen, Hartwig
  • Klasen, Stephan
  • Qaim, Matin
  • Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Courant Research Centre - Poverty, Equity and Growth (CRC-PEG)

Entstanden

  • 2011

Ähnliche Objekte (12)